For the past months, the universe has been whispering to me. Saying that out loud makes my researcher self cringe, but hey, the universe whispered to Einstein too, and he did ok.
Anyway, after multiple hints, this month my needs-to-be-hit-over-the-head-to-notice-things individual mind picked up on these hints, and I thought to myself:
“I’m no longer just studying self-organizing groups like I used to. Groups that I’m able, in my own mind, to see as separate groups. Many of my groups are now overlapping and recreating themselves. The boundaries change too often to keep track of. Most days, it seems, I’m now studying communities within which self-organizing groups form and reform at will. When did that happen? Is there such a thing as a self-organizing community? There appears to be. What the heck is a self-organizing community?”
Honestly, I also thought “Thank God I’m not working at a university at the moment, because I can’t imagine explaining that I just recognized what I’ve actually been studying (in addition to what I was conscious I was studying) most of this year in a formal setting. Fortunately, those of you reading this—my community—will likely encourage me, question and stretch me, and forgive me, as needed. How do I know this? Because you already do so every single day.
Practice evolution
How my practice is evolving right now:
- I appear to be studying self-organizing communities. My own self-organizing groups now regularly overlap, create, and then recreate themselves into new, different groups. This is making it too difficult to study them as independent groups, and keep track of their numbers, because their boundaries keep changing (as in “I’m studying 35 groups, no now 32, no now 34, no now 28…”). I have to think of them as communities to reflect what is happening in my own life and around the groups I study. Also, in part, to make my work life still do-able (as in “Hey. Those 38 or so moving, interweaving groups I’ve been killing myself to keep track of separately are actually all one community!”).
- Smaller groups still matter. Although I’m now consciously focusing on the community as a whole instead of separate smaller groups, I still study self-organizing groups. It’s just that now I recognize that many of the groups that appear separate today are likely to reform, change, and reemerge as other groups. I know that many of these smaller groups may be recognized by me and others as part of larger communities eventually.
- The importance of individuals is coming clearer. The importance of the individual is coming back onto my radar. Think this is related to living and thinking at the community level much of the time, not sure. But I’ll be writing more about the importance of individuals—and the relationship between self-organizing individuals, groups, and communities—in the coming year. My friend Doug and I are already doing this in an ebook we’re co-creating right now. This is just ridiculously fun work for me. Creative energy pours out of this collaboration and hidden ideas emerge daily! Wow. I can’t believe how lucky I am to be doing this!
- I’m working on defining “self-organizing community” for myself. At the moment this is in my mind: “The larger collective that becomes visible to self-organizing groups and floods them with even more gratitude.” This definition is fluid and evolving daily for me at the moment. I’ll create full posts on this later after I get more input from my community.
- My work is getting easier, giving me time to become and do more. For example, I don’t have to go looking for new groups to study anymore because my community finds (and becomes) them for me. And now, most days, my community puts better examples and ideas directly into my hands than I’d ever have time or energy to search for and find on my own. I also don’t have to plan what I’m going to write about anymore. The groups I’m part of and studying are consistently amazing, so whatever is happening in the moment, thanks to my community, works for me. I need only dip my cup into the river that is the community that moment. I feel more like a highlighter pen for human amazingness than a researcher or writer anymore, because most days my individual perspective cannot improve upon what these amazing communities are already doing. Most days, my community improves me as an individual and us as self-organizing groups, not the other way around. I help simply by doing what I love to do: documenting the heck out of what’s happening within and around them.
I’d appreciate your help
I’d like your help defining what self-organizing community means. What does this mean to you, based on your own experience and imagination? Drop me an email (lori@collectiveself.com), or a comment here, or an idea on twitter or facebook, or if you’re close by, let’s go to coffee to talk about it. My deepest thanks in advance.
In my next post, I’ll talk more about how my own self-organizing community helped me hear the hints the universe was sending my way.
In the meantime, here are some shots of my own self-organizing community…
Wait. Really? Did I see that picture? 🙂 I want the tuba next time. Or the crown?
The overarching principle you are talking about, sounds a lot about proximity that is needed for groups to form in the first place. (I read that somewhere on your blog, but cannot find it so fast). Perhaps the community is the big pond we swim in, based upon shared interests, geography, friends etc. The universe is telling me that it can be that the community is created in a more passive way, and the groups require intent/action. But I must admit that the universe also told me it was going to be a sunny summer in Europe.
With projects where team members “come from” and where they will be going next is actually a very important question.
With your bone structure you could also probably pull off the Lady GaGa makeup and wig. I’ll make you a deal. If you post THAT photo to Facebook, it’ll show up here very quickly. 🙂
I’ve studied so many SOGs that I’m now aware the moment I’m part of one. I can feel it in the group–in the humor, in the syncronicity that people experience, in members’ awareness that they’ll be forgiven when they mess up, the ability to speak for the group without needing to verbally check in with each other, to expand on other people’s thoughts with minimal pause or worry, collective idea creation, in the fluid adaptability of the group, etc. But in self-organizing groups, this appears to be related to growing closeness–in coming to deeply know, respect, and trust one person in the group, then others, then everyone in the group, then people and groups around the group. What’s been happening to me this year is that I’m noticing and experiencing these same indicators within much larger groups–communities in which some or many of the people are complete strangers. My own neighbors pulled off an amazing block party this year with nobody in charge, everybody pitching in, everybody bringing and doing their own thing, and very little planning. Remarkable given the size of our urban neighborhood and that many people don’t know each other. Or is it? Many self-organizing groups have been community building here for years. At events like the block party, the deeper community comes clear to everyone.
Yet not everyone has to be conscious that the group itself is amazing—that the group itself is the leader—as needs to happen in smaller self-organizing groups. Some people will call the fun block party luck and tell us that we’re lucky to live on this street. That’s ok. It’s still an amazing experience and the different levels of awareness why it’s amazing all feel important to me.
What you say makes it more clear that this is an important new level for me to be learning about. Just when I think my work couldn’t possibly get any more fascinating or fun!
Thanks Bas,
Lori